<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Probstisms - Latest Comments in Have You Tried Google Reader?</title><link>http://probstisms.disqus.com/</link><description>Technology, music, sports, and anything else that comes to mind.</description><atom:link href="https://probstisms.disqus.com/have_you_tried_google_reader/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:27:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Have You Tried Google Reader?</title><link>http://blog.timprobst.com/2007/08/26/have-you-tried-google-reader/#comment-1802242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Joe, you're right about that refresh obsession.  I get bummed when I have no new articles to read, and I find myself hitting the Refresh button more than I should.  Google Reader makes it so easy to get through feeds that I am able to read more sources than ever before without feeling like I have information overload.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Probstisms</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have You Tried Google Reader?</title><link>http://blog.timprobst.com/2007/08/26/have-you-tried-google-reader/#comment-1802241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, yes, I love Google Reader, too, for all the reasons you list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, it's so good and so convenient, that I find it has become one of those "refresh" obsessions one can occassionally fall prey to. I find that in gaining convenience, I also "read" a lot (a LOT) more blogs and other information than I did before Reader came into my life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Fusco</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>